Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lay v. Schmidbauer Lumber, Inc., 17-cv-03819-YGR. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170913c14 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 30, 2017
Summary: SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER COMPLAINT YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, and Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff and Defendant hereby stipulate to extend the time within which Defendant has to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action or around July 17, 2017, and Defendant was served with the Complaint and Summons on or around July 21, 2017. With this stipulati
More

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, and Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff and Defendant hereby stipulate to extend the time within which Defendant has to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action or around July 17, 2017, and Defendant was served with the Complaint and Summons on or around July 21, 2017. With this stipulation, Defendant's deadline for answering and or otherwise responding to the Complaint is extended to September 22, 2017.

The parties submit that the additional time will not alter any deadline set by the Court, and agree that pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), this stipulation is respectfully submitted to the Court for approval without the necessity of a hearing or Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer