AGYEMAN v. TD BANK USA, N.A., 5:17-cv-04092-HRL. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170914a08
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE Re: Dkt. No. 12 HOWARD R. LLOYD , Magistrate Judge . Brian Melendez moves for admission pro hac vice. Counsel wishing to appear pro hac vice in this district must have co-counsel who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office within the State of California. Civ. L.R. 11-3(a)(3). Mr. Melendez identifies co-counsel who has not been found on the membership rolls of the bar
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE Re: Dkt. No. 12 HOWARD R. LLOYD , Magistrate Judge . Brian Melendez moves for admission pro hac vice. Counsel wishing to appear pro hac vice in this district must have co-counsel who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office within the State of California. Civ. L.R. 11-3(a)(3). Mr. Melendez identifies co-counsel who has not been found on the membership rolls of the bar ..
More
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
Re: Dkt. No. 12
HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.
Brian Melendez moves for admission pro hac vice. Counsel wishing to appear pro hac vice in this district must have co-counsel who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office within the State of California. Civ. L.R. 11-3(a)(3). Mr. Melendez identifies co-counsel who has not been found on the membership rolls of the bar of this Court. Accordingly, the application for appearance in pro hac vice is denied, without prejudice to renew the request in compliance with Civil Local Rule 11-3.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
