Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ESTATE OF RENZEL v. ESTATE OF VENTURA, 4:15-cv-1648-HSG. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170918779 Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 15, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . WHEREAS, pursuant to the discussion with the Court at the September 14, 2017 Case Management Conference, the parties have met and conferred regarding a proposed modification of the case schedule to further mediation efforts; WHEREAS, a pilot test has been proposed for additional environmental investigation to support the development of a final remedial action plan and cost estimate; WHEREAS, the envir
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE

WHEREAS, pursuant to the discussion with the Court at the September 14, 2017 Case Management Conference, the parties have met and conferred regarding a proposed modification of the case schedule to further mediation efforts;

WHEREAS, a pilot test has been proposed for additional environmental investigation to support the development of a final remedial action plan and cost estimate;

WHEREAS, the environmental consultants for Renzel have approved the technical scope of the pilot test at a fixed cost of $237,148.50;

WHEREAS, Renzel and Torres have worked diligently and in good faith with each other to negotiate an agreement to share the costs of the pilot test, but have not been able to come to an agreement;

WHEREAS, Torres filed a motion for summary judgment against Renzel, ECF No. 187, currently set for hearing on November 16, 2017;

WHEREAS, Renzel's opposition to Torres's motion for summary judgment is currently due September 26, 2017 and Torres's reply brief is due October 3, 2017;

WHEREAS, the Court set the current deadlines in this matter in its May 15, 2017 Order Amending Case Schedule and Vacating Case Management Conference, ECF No. 167; and

WHEREAS, the parties agree to continue expert discovery deadlines by approximately 30 days, to facilitate mediation of a cost sharing agreement for the pilot study;

THEREFORE, all parties1 herby stipulate with each other as follows, and request that the Court so order the terms of this stipulation:

1. No later than October 13, 2017, Renzel and Torres will conduct a mediation session to reach an agreement on cost sharing for the pilot study mentioned above, and thereby will provide approval for commencement of the investigation. An insurance company representative with authority to settle shall attend the mediation session in person for each of Renzel's and Torres's respective insurers. If Renzel and Torres reach a cost sharing agreement prior to October 13, 2017, a mediation session shall not be necessary;

2. No later than October 13, 2017, the parties shall report back to the Court on the result of the mediation;

3. If a stipulation to stay the litigation, including the length of time proposed for such a stay, is not filed by October 13, 2017, the parties shall appear at a further Case Management Conference on October 17, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, before the Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.;

4. The briefing schedule for Torres's motion for summary judgment against Renzel, ECF No. 187, shall be modified as follows: Renzel's opposition is due no later than October 27, 2017; Torres's reply shall be due no later than November 6, 2017; the hearing shall remain as scheduled for November 16, 2017; and

5. The following deadlines shall be set for this matter:

a. Affirmative expert designation: October 16, 2017 b. Rebuttal expert designation: November 6, 2017 c. Expert discovery cutoff: December 4, 2017 d. Deadline for hearing of dispositive motions: January 18, 2017, at 2:00p.m. e. Pretrial conference: April 10, 2018, at 3:00 p.m. f. Trial date: April 23, 2018, at 8:30 a.m.

Good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED except that the deadline for hearing of dispositive motions is January 18, 2018, at 2:00p.m.

FootNotes


1. A copy of this stipulation was provided to all pro se parties via email on September 14, 2017, requesting their review and agreement by signature. No objections were received.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer