DROTTS v. SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY, 17-cv-04916-DMR. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170919793
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . Defendant San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency filed a motion to dismiss on August 30, 2017. Currently, the motion is set for a court hearing on October 12, 2017. Plaintiff Joel Drotts is pursuing this action without legal representation. According to the local court rules, Plaintiff should have filed any brief in opposition to Defendant's motion by September 13, 2017. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). The court has received no such oppos
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . Defendant San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency filed a motion to dismiss on August 30, 2017. Currently, the motion is set for a court hearing on October 12, 2017. Plaintiff Joel Drotts is pursuing this action without legal representation. According to the local court rules, Plaintiff should have filed any brief in opposition to Defendant's motion by September 13, 2017. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). The court has received no such opposi..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency filed a motion to dismiss on August 30, 2017. Currently, the motion is set for a court hearing on October 12, 2017. Plaintiff Joel Drotts is pursuing this action without legal representation. According to the local court rules, Plaintiff should have filed any brief in opposition to Defendant's motion by September 13, 2017. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). The court has received no such opposition.
The court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond by September 27, 2017 and explain his failure to respond to the motion. In addition, Plaintiff must simultaneously (1) submit his opposition to the court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion. This order to show cause does not indicate that the court will necessarily accept Plaintiff's late submission. If Plaintiff does not respond by September 27, 2017, Defendant's motion may be granted or the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
