Sai v. Smith, 16-cv-01024-JST. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170921786
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, both the Federal Defendants and defendant Covenant Aviation Security, LLC ("Covenant") have filed motions to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"); WHEREAS, said motions are set for hearing on November 9, 2017; WHEREAS, Plaintiff intends to request to appear at the hearing by phone/video conference, which Defendants do not oppose; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by Plaintiff, the
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, both the Federal Defendants and defendant Covenant Aviation Security, LLC ("Covenant") have filed motions to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"); WHEREAS, said motions are set for hearing on November 9, 2017; WHEREAS, Plaintiff intends to request to appear at the hearing by phone/video conference, which Defendants do not oppose; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by Plaintiff, the F..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
WHEREAS, both the Federal Defendants and defendant Covenant Aviation Security, LLC ("Covenant") have filed motions to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint ("SAC");
WHEREAS, said motions are set for hearing on November 9, 2017;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff intends to request to appear at the hearing by phone/video conference, which Defendants do not oppose;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by Plaintiff, the Federal Defendants, and Covenant that:
1. Plaintiff's oppositions to the motions to dismiss shall be due on October 6, 2017;
2. Defendants' reply briefs shall be due on October 20, 2017; and
3. The date of the hearing shall remain unchanged.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle