Filed: Oct. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2017
Summary: SECOND STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff Francisca Moralez ("Plaintiff"), and Defendants Lutticken Incorporated, Robert W. Lutticken, and Jeannie B. Lutticken ("Defendants") jointly stipulate to extend the time for Defendants to respond to the initial complaint from September 29, 2017 to October 13, 2017. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), this extension will affect only the October 3 deadlin
Summary: SECOND STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff Francisca Moralez ("Plaintiff"), and Defendants Lutticken Incorporated, Robert W. Lutticken, and Jeannie B. Lutticken ("Defendants") jointly stipulate to extend the time for Defendants to respond to the initial complaint from September 29, 2017 to October 13, 2017. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), this extension will affect only the October 3 deadline..
More
SECOND STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff Francisca Moralez ("Plaintiff"), and Defendants Lutticken Incorporated, Robert W. Lutticken, and Jeannie B. Lutticken ("Defendants") jointly stipulate to extend the time for Defendants to respond to the initial complaint from September 29, 2017 to October 13, 2017.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), this extension will affect only the October 3 deadline under GO 56 for the parties to conduct a join inspection of the property at issue in the Complaint. The parties have agreed to conduct the joint inspection and required meet and confer on October 25. This extension will not alter the date of any other event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of causing unwarranted delay, but to allow the parties time to further explore informal resolution. This is Defendants' second request for an extension.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
I, Kristina M. Launey, attest that concurrennce in the filing of this stipulation has been obtained from the signatory Zachary M. Best, counsel for Plaintiff. Dated: September 29, 2017.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO OORDERED.
