OAKLAND BULK & OVERSIZED TERMINAL, LLC v. CITY OF OAKLAND, 3:16-CV-7014-VC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171004h23
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2017
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING THE CITY OF OAKLAND'S REQUEST TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO CONTENTION INTERROGATORIES VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . Now before the Court is Defendant City of Oakland's (the "City's") request that Plaintiff Oakland Bulk & Oversized Terminal, LLC ("OBOT") be compelled to respond to contention interrogatories propounded by the City immediately, weeks in advance of the close of fact discovery set by this Court (October 20, 2017). Upon consideration of the joint letter su
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING THE CITY OF OAKLAND'S REQUEST TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO CONTENTION INTERROGATORIES VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . Now before the Court is Defendant City of Oakland's (the "City's") request that Plaintiff Oakland Bulk & Oversized Terminal, LLC ("OBOT") be compelled to respond to contention interrogatories propounded by the City immediately, weeks in advance of the close of fact discovery set by this Court (October 20, 2017). Upon consideration of the joint letter sub..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING THE CITY OF OAKLAND'S REQUEST TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO CONTENTION INTERROGATORIES
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
Now before the Court is Defendant City of Oakland's (the "City's") request that Plaintiff Oakland Bulk & Oversized Terminal, LLC ("OBOT") be compelled to respond to contention interrogatories propounded by the City immediately, weeks in advance of the close of fact discovery set by this Court (October 20, 2017). Upon consideration of the joint letter submitted by the parties, and all other materials deemed necessary by the Court, the Court finds that the City of Oakland has not met its burden of justification and hereby DENIES the City's request.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
