BLUELINE SOFTWARE SERVICES, INC. v. SYSTEMS AMERICA, INC., 17-cv-01960-EMC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171004h40
Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2017
Summary: ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING Docket No. 31. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . The parties are ordered to file supplemental briefs not to exceed 4 pages in length by 1pm PDT on Friday, October 6, 2017 addressing (a) whether a common law unfair competition claim may encompass a claim for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage and (b) the relevance of Woods v. Fox Broadcasting Sub., Inc., 129 Cal.App.4th 344 (2005) and Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arab
Summary: ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING Docket No. 31. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . The parties are ordered to file supplemental briefs not to exceed 4 pages in length by 1pm PDT on Friday, October 6, 2017 addressing (a) whether a common law unfair competition claim may encompass a claim for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage and (b) the relevance of Woods v. Fox Broadcasting Sub., Inc., 129 Cal.App.4th 344 (2005) and Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabi..
More
ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
Docket No. 31.
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
The parties are ordered to file supplemental briefs not to exceed 4 pages in length by 1pm PDT on Friday, October 6, 2017 addressing (a) whether a common law unfair competition claim may encompass a claim for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage and (b) the relevance of Woods v. Fox Broadcasting Sub., Inc., 129 Cal.App.4th 344 (2005) and Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd., 7 Cal.4th 503 (1994).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
