Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

RAZZAK v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 17-cv-04939-MMC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171004h43 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; VACATING HEARING MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Before the Court is defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s motion to dismiss, filed August 31, 2017, by which motion defendant seeks dismissal of the Complaint filed in the above-titled action on July 21, 2017. On September 28, 2017, plaintiff Nazreen Razzak timely filed, pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a First Amended Complaint. Accordingly, defendant's mo
More

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; VACATING HEARING

Before the Court is defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s motion to dismiss, filed August 31, 2017, by which motion defendant seeks dismissal of the Complaint filed in the above-titled action on July 21, 2017. On September 28, 2017, plaintiff Nazreen Razzak timely filed, pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a First Amended Complaint.

Accordingly, defendant's motion to dismiss the initial complaint is hereby DENIED as moot and the hearing scheduled for October 27, 2017, is hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer