Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Acosta v. Shingal, 5:17-mc-80119-HRL. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171006w60 Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 05, 2017
Summary: (PROPOSED) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE On Secretary of Labor's Petition to Enforce Administrative Subpoena Duces Tecum (29 U.S.C 209) HOWARD R. LLOYD , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner, R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, has applied to this Court for an Order requiring Mira Shingal; Ajay Shingal; Apex Global International, Inc.; Delta Hotel Group, L.P; SAI RAM Hospitality Group Inc.; SAI RAM Hotel Group, Inc.; Silicon Valley International, Inc.; Starlig
More

(PROPOSED) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On Secretary of Labor's Petition to Enforce Administrative Subpoena Duces Tecum (29 U.S.C § 209)

Petitioner, R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, has applied to this Court for an Order requiring Mira Shingal; Ajay Shingal; Apex Global International, Inc.; Delta Hotel Group, L.P; SAI RAM Hospitality Group Inc.; SAI RAM Hotel Group, Inc.; Silicon Valley International, Inc.; Starlight Management Group, Inc.; Sterling International Group, LLC; and Symbian International, Inc. (collectively, "Respondents") to produce the records, papers and documents set forth in a subpoenas duces tecum issued by the Regional Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, and duly served upon the Respondents. Having considered the matters set forth in the Petitioner's pleadings herein, it is hereby

ORDERED that Respondents appear and SHOW CAUSE, if any there be, why the Respondent should not be ordered by this Court to comply with the subpoenas duces tecum issued to the Respondents by the Regional Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor; and it is further

ORDERED that Respondent serve and file with the Clerk of this Court, no later than October 24, 2017, a response to the Petition, specifically admitting or denying each allegation of the Petition, and setting forth the cause, if any Petitioner's reply, if any, is due October 31, 2017. there be, why the Petition should not be granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the Respondent appear at a hearing to be held on the Petition on November 14, 2017, at 10:00 AM o'clock, in courtroom number 2, Fifth Floor, located at 280 S. 1st Street, San Jose CA _____________________________; and it is further

ORDERED that the running of the applicable statute of limitations is tolled from February 17, 2017, until such time as the Petitioner notifies this Court that Respondents have complied with the administrative subpoenas and this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that an Investigator from the Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Depart-ment of Labor, shall forthwith serve copies of this Order to Show Cause and a copy of the Petition and supporting documents on Respondents.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer