STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CHANGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION REQUESTING COURT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER STATE LAW CLAIMS

KANDIS A. WESTMORE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Brendan Huerta, by and through his counsel of record, Steve Brady, Esq. of Brady Law Group, and Defendant, Akima Facilities Management, LLC. ("Defendant"), by and through their counsel of record, Natalie M. Kuzma, Esq. of Littler Mendelson P.C., hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On September 18, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Motion Requesting Court Decline to Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction Over State Law Claims (dkt 81).

2. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, Defendant's Opposition is due October 2 and Plaintiff's Reply is due October 9. The hearing on the motion is set for November 2, 2017.

3. The attorney at Brady Law Group responsible for this matter has a long planned vacation from October 2 through October 9, and will be unable to prepare a Reply if the briefing schedule is not changed.

4. The parties therefore request that Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Court Decline to Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction Over State Law Claims be due October 9 and Plaintiff's Reply be due October 16.

5. If the Court requires it, the parties are amenable to having the hearing date on the motion be continued to November 16, 2017, or the first available date thereafter.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Court Decline to Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction Over State Law Claims is due October 9 and Plaintiff's Reply is due October 16.

___ The hearing date on the motion will remain November 2, 2017.

or

X The hearing date on the motion is continued to November 16, 2017., at 1:00 pm.

IT IS SO ORDERED.