Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ticer v. Board of Trustees of the California State University, 4:16-cv-02198-KAW. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171010b26 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2017
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . The Plaintiff having requested and being in need of counsel to assist him in this matter and good and just cause appearing, IT IS HEARBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Mark Ticer shall be referred to the Federal Pro Bono Project ("Project") in the matter set forth below: 1. The clerk shall forward the Referral Order to the Project office in San Francisco. The scope of this referral s
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

The Plaintiff having requested and being in need of counsel to assist him in this matter and good and just cause appearing,

IT IS HEARBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Mark Ticer shall be referred to the Federal Pro Bono Project ("Project") in the matter set forth below:

1. The clerk shall forward the Referral Order to the Project office in San Francisco. The scope of this referral shall be for full scope representation.

2. All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed until four weeks from the date of this order. Counsel shall be familiar with General Order No. 25 posted on the Court's website.

3. Upon being notified by the Project that an attorney has been located to represent Plaintiff, that attorney shall be appointed as counsel for Mark Ticer in this matter for the scope of representation described above.

4. All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed for three weeks.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer