FISHMAN v. TIGER NATURAL GAS, INC., 17-cv-05351-JCS. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171012d52
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 11, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 8. JOSEPH C. SPERO , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. ("Tiger") moved to dismiss Plaintiff Emily Fishman's initial complaint. See Mot. to Dismiss (dkt. 8). Fishman has since filed an amended complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See 1st Am. Class Action Compl. (dkt. 13). Because the amended complaint supersedes the previous complaint, Tiger's motion to dismiss the original
Summary: ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 8. JOSEPH C. SPERO , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. ("Tiger") moved to dismiss Plaintiff Emily Fishman's initial complaint. See Mot. to Dismiss (dkt. 8). Fishman has since filed an amended complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See 1st Am. Class Action Compl. (dkt. 13). Because the amended complaint supersedes the previous complaint, Tiger's motion to dismiss the original ..
More
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. No. 8.
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. ("Tiger") moved to dismiss Plaintiff Emily Fishman's initial complaint. See Mot. to Dismiss (dkt. 8). Fishman has since filed an amended complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See 1st Am. Class Action Compl. (dkt. 13). Because the amended complaint supersedes the previous complaint, Tiger's motion to dismiss the original complaint is DENIED AS MOOT, without prejudice to any argument that any defendant might raise in response to the amended complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
