JOHNSON v. KHAN PETROLEUM, INC., 16-cv-04170-SI (SI). (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171012d54
Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 11, 2017
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . The parties to the action, by their counsel, have advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. However, that if any party hereto certifies to this court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within ninety days from the date hereof, that settlement has not in fact occurred, the foregoing order shall be vacated and this cau
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . The parties to the action, by their counsel, have advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. However, that if any party hereto certifies to this court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within ninety days from the date hereof, that settlement has not in fact occurred, the foregoing order shall be vacated and this caus..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
The parties to the action, by their counsel, have advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. However, that if any party hereto certifies to this court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within ninety days from the date hereof, that settlement has not in fact occurred, the foregoing order shall be vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
