Filed: Oct. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, as stated on the record at the status conference on September 27, 2017, that the time between September 27, 2017, and October 23, 2017, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B). Excluding time until October 23, 2017, will allow defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, as stated on the record at the status conference on September 27, 2017, that the time between September 27, 2017, and October 23, 2017, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B). Excluding time until October 23, 2017, will allow defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for ..
More
STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
STIPULATION
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, as stated on the record at the status conference on September 27, 2017, that the time between September 27, 2017, and October 23, 2017, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B). Excluding time until October 23, 2017, will allow defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 216(h)(7)(B)(iv).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
As explained on the record during the September 27, 2017 status conference, the Court finds that the exclusion of the period from September 27, 2017, to October 23, 2017, from the time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161, is warranted; that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in the prompt disposition of this criminal case; and that the failure to grant the requested exclusion of time would unreasonably deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and would result in a miscarriage of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
