Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WROTH v. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, 17-cv-05339-JST. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171023h52 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 19, 2017
Summary: PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS' STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiffs and defendants CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, DAVID SITTIG-WATTSON, and SEAN HUOT, through their respective counsel, agree and stipulate as follows: 1. Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER WROTH and MARNI WROTH filed their Complaint on September 14, 2017. 2. In light of conditions in Sonoma County, Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed
More

PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS' STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiffs and defendants CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, DAVID SITTIG-WATTSON, and SEAN HUOT, through their respective counsel, agree and stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER WROTH and MARNI WROTH filed their Complaint on September 14, 2017.

2. In light of conditions in Sonoma County, Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed to extend the time to answer the Complaint to Wednesday, October 25, 2017.

4. This extension of time does not alter any other dates or events already fixed by the Court.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories to this document.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer