Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Moralez v. David & Esperanza Chavez Family Limited Partnership, 3:17-cv-03918-JST. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171026c17 Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE JOINT SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED BY GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiff, Francisca Moralez ("Plaintiff"), and Defendants, David & Esperanza Chavez Family Limited Partnership dba Chavez Supermarket; Chavez Supermarket Holding Corp. dba Chavez Supermarket; John E. McNellis, Trustee of the McNellis Family Trust u/a dated October 6, 1993; Michele R. McNellis, Trustee of the McNellis Family Trust u/a dated Oc
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE JOINT SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED BY GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff, Francisca Moralez ("Plaintiff"), and Defendants, David & Esperanza Chavez Family Limited Partnership dba Chavez Supermarket; Chavez Supermarket Holding Corp. dba Chavez Supermarket; John E. McNellis, Trustee of the McNellis Family Trust u/a dated October 6, 1993; Michele R. McNellis, Trustee of the McNellis Family Trust u/a dated October 6, 1993; and Michael S. Powers, Trustee of the Erik Ragnar McNellis Trust dated December 1, 2012, as Trustee of the Jamie Taylor McNellis Trust dated December 1, 2012, as Trustee of the Jennifer Dalton McNellis Trust dated December 1, 2012, and as Trustee of the Courtney Blaine McNellis Trust dated December 1, 2012 (collectively "Defendants," and together with Plaintiff, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. This action arises out of Plaintiff's claims that Defendants denied her full and equal access to their public accommodation on account of her disabilities in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and parallel California law. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief under federal and California law, as well as damages under California law. This matter therefore proceeds under this district's General Order 56 which governs ADA access matters.

2. The Court has ordered that the Parties conduct a joint site inspection of the subject property on or before October 24, 2017 (Dkt. 4).

3. The Parties are engaging in settlement discussions and wish to avoid incurring additional attorney's fees and costs incident to attending the joint site inspection while settlement efforts are being exhausted.

4. The Parties have agreed to conduct the joint site inspection on November 21, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. if the matter does not settle prior to that time, subject to the Parties' reservation to further modify the date if necessary.

5. Accordingly, the Parties stipulate to extend the deadline to conduct the joint site inspection to November 21, 2017, with all dates triggered by that deadline continued accordingly.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION

Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the individual(s) whose electronic signature is attributed above.

ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for the Parties to complete the joint site inspection is extended to November 21, 2017, with all dates triggered by that deadline continued accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer