Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rhom v. Thumbtack, Inc., 4:16-cv-02008-HSG. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171026c31 Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2017
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . The Court having entered on October 17, 2017 an Order Granting Motion for Final Approval approving the Settlement between Plaintiff Michael Rhom, individually and in his representative capacity, and Defendant Thumbtack, Inc. ("Thumbtack," and, collectively with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that: 1. Judgment is hereby entered in this case in accordance with the Court's October 17, 2017 Order
More

FINAL JUDGMENT

The Court having entered on October 17, 2017 an Order Granting Motion for Final Approval approving the Settlement between Plaintiff Michael Rhom, individually and in his representative capacity, and Defendant Thumbtack, Inc. ("Thumbtack," and, collectively with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that:

1. Judgment is hereby entered in this case in accordance with the Court's October 17, 2017 Order Granting the Motion for Final Approval as to all Released Claims against Thumbtack in this Action.

2. The above-captioned Action is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice.

3. The Parties shall take all actions required of them by the Final Approval Order and the Settlement Agreement.

4. Except as otherwise provided in this Order and in the order awarding attorneys' fees and expenses to Class Counsel, granting an incentive award to the Class Representative and approving the plan of allocation and distribution, the Parties will bear their own attorneys' fees, costs and expenses.

5. Without affecting the finality of the judgment hereby entered, the Court reserves jurisdiction over the implementation of the Settlement, including enforcement and administration of the Settlement Agreement, including any releases in connection therewith, and any other matters related or ancillary to the foregoing.

6. This document constitutes a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 and a separate document for purposes of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a)

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer