WAYMO LLC v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., C 17-00939 WHA. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171030h23
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER AFTER HEARING ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . For the reasons stated on the record at yesterday's hearing, plaintiff Waymo LLC's motion for leave to file an amended list of asserted trade secrets for trial, supplemental expert reports, and revised witness and exhibit lists (Dkt. No. 2062) is GRANTED IN PART with respect to expert witnesses, lay witnesses, and exhibits pertaining to currently-asserted trade secrets, except that defendants' objection rega
Summary: ORDER AFTER HEARING ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . For the reasons stated on the record at yesterday's hearing, plaintiff Waymo LLC's motion for leave to file an amended list of asserted trade secrets for trial, supplemental expert reports, and revised witness and exhibit lists (Dkt. No. 2062) is GRANTED IN PART with respect to expert witnesses, lay witnesses, and exhibits pertaining to currently-asserted trade secrets, except that defendants' objection regar..
More
ORDER AFTER HEARING ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
For the reasons stated on the record at yesterday's hearing, plaintiff Waymo LLC's motion for leave to file an amended list of asserted trade secrets for trial, supplemental expert reports, and revised witness and exhibit lists (Dkt. No. 2062) is GRANTED IN PART with respect to expert witnesses, lay witnesses, and exhibits pertaining to currently-asserted trade secrets, except that defendants' objection regarding Neel Chatterjee is HELD IN ABEYANCE. This is subject to the conditions stated on the record and without prejudice to any individual objections targeted to specific new exhibits. As stated on the record, Waymo's motion is otherwise HELD IN ABEYANCE with respect to its proposed new trade secret claims.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
