Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Williams v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 3:16-CV-07152-JST (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171101b73 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO N.D. CAL. CIV. L.R. 6-1 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, a case management conference is scheduled for November 1, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. in this case and the related Martin case; WHEREAS, plaintiffs' motion to dismiss McKesson ( Williams Doc. 81 and Martin Doc. 40) had also been scheduled for hearing on November 1, 2017. WHEREAS, the Court entered an order granting plaintiffs' motion to dismi
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO N.D. CAL. CIV. L.R. 6-1

WHEREAS, a case management conference is scheduled for November 1, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. in this case and the related Martin case;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs' motion to dismiss McKesson (Williams Doc. 81 and Martin Doc. 40) had also been scheduled for hearing on November 1, 2017.

WHEREAS, the Court entered an order granting plaintiffs' motion to dismiss McKesson without the need for oral argument on October 24, 2017 (Williams Doc. 96 and Martin Doc. 52) and denying as moot Defendants' motion for a determination of subject matter jurisdiction (Williams Doc. 74 and Martin Doc. 39);

WHEREAS, on October 11, 2017, plaintiffs filed with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation a motion to transfer for coordinated and consolidated pretrial proceedings;

WHEREAS, the parties believe that, with the concurrent hearing of plaintiff's motion to dismiss McKesson being canceled and the limited items to be discussed at a case management conference at this time, postponing the case management conference until after the ruling of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation would promote judicial efficiency and economy;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate as follows:

The case management conference scheduled for November 1, 2017, be continued to December 20, 2017.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Signature Attestation (N.D. Cal. L.R. 5-1(i)(3))

I, William E. Steimle, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory whose ECF user ID and password are not being used in the electronic filing of this document.

Having considered Plaintiffs' and Defendants (collectively, the Parties') Stipulation for Order to Continue the November 1, 2017 case management conference, and good cause appearing, the Parties' Stipulation is GRANTED.

The November 1, 2017 case management conference is continued to December 20, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer