GUERRERO v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, C 13-05671 WHA. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171102a87
Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2017
Summary: ORDER RE OBJECTION TO COSTS WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . On October 17, defendant State Personnel Board submitted a bill of costs. SPB is seeking a total of $13,203.70 incurred in defending this action (Dkt. No. 389-1). Plaintiff opposes an award of costs altogether on the grounds that paying these costs would be a hardship for him due to his limited financial resources, and awarding costs would discourage future meritorious employment discrimination suits. Plaintiff also objects costs
Summary: ORDER RE OBJECTION TO COSTS WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . On October 17, defendant State Personnel Board submitted a bill of costs. SPB is seeking a total of $13,203.70 incurred in defending this action (Dkt. No. 389-1). Plaintiff opposes an award of costs altogether on the grounds that paying these costs would be a hardship for him due to his limited financial resources, and awarding costs would discourage future meritorious employment discrimination suits. Plaintiff also objects costs ..
More
ORDER RE OBJECTION TO COSTS
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
On October 17, defendant State Personnel Board submitted a bill of costs. SPB is seeking a total of $13,203.70 incurred in defending this action (Dkt. No. 389-1).
Plaintiff opposes an award of costs altogether on the grounds that paying these costs would be a hardship for him due to his limited financial resources, and awarding costs would discourage future meritorious employment discrimination suits. Plaintiff also objects costs on the separate grounds that they are not taxable (Dkt. No. 391). The State Personnel Board may respond to plaintiffs arguments by NOVEMBER 9.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
