Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CALIFORNIA v. BP P.L.C., C 17-06011 WHA. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171102b16 Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2017
Summary: ORDER RELATING CASES WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . All plaintiffs and all defendants have stipulated that The People of the State of California v. BP P.L.C. et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-06012 EMC is related to this action. Having considered the motion to relate and stipulation, the undersigned judge finds that The People of the State of California v. BP P.L.C. et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-06012 EMC is related, and shall be reassigned to the undersigned judge. The parties are instructed that
More

ORDER RELATING CASES

All plaintiffs and all defendants have stipulated that The People of the State of California v. BP P.L.C. et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-06012 EMC is related to this action.

Having considered the motion to relate and stipulation, the undersigned judge finds that The People of the State of California v. BP P.L.C. et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-06012 EMC is related, and shall be reassigned to the undersigned judge. The parties are instructed that all future filings in the reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re-noticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge. Any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect, and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer