Filed: Nov. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER. RICHARD G. SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff HP Inc. ("HP"), formerly known as Hewlett-Packard Company, and Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipula
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER. RICHARD G. SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff HP Inc. ("HP"), formerly known as Hewlett-Packard Company, and Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulat..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER.
RICHARD G. SEEBORG, District Judge.
Plaintiff HP Inc. ("HP"), formerly known as Hewlett-Packard Company, and Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to Defendants with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of HP against any other defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
FILER ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Beatrice B. Nguyen, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
