Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Daugherty v. SolarCity Corporation, 3:16-cv-05155-WHA. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171106689 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2017
Summary: CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Plaintiff Breana Daugherty ("Plaintiff") and Defendant SolarCity Corporation ("Defendant" or "SolarCity"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby submit this joint stipulation to stay the case pending the outcome of Morris et al. v. Ernst & Young, LLP, 834 F.3d 975 , 980 (9th Cir. 2016) (" Morris "). WHEREAS, on January 13, 2017, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Morris, Case No. 16-3
More

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE

Plaintiff Breana Daugherty ("Plaintiff") and Defendant SolarCity Corporation ("Defendant" or "SolarCity"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby submit this joint stipulation to stay the case pending the outcome of Morris et al. v. Ernst & Young, LLP, 834 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir. 2016) ("Morris").

WHEREAS, on January 13, 2017, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Morris, Case No. 16-300;

WHEREAS, the parties requested a stay of the appeal pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Daugherty v. SolarCity Corporation, 17-15363), and the stay was granted on August 28, 2017;

WHEREAS, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Morris on October 2, 2017;

WHEREAS, the parties believe that a stay pending a decision in Morris will be more efficient for this Court and the parties.

THEREFORE, the parties request that this Court stay the case pending the outcome of Morris.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attesta that concurrence in the filing of this documetn has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant tot he parties' stipulation, and good cause being shown, the Courtstaysthe case pending the outcome of Morris et al. v. Ernst & Young, LLP, 834 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir. 2016).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer