STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

Pursuant to paragraph 1(d) of the Honorable William H. Orrick's Case Management Conference Order (Dkt. 20) and L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiffs Sherida Johnson, Harry Gunsenhouser, and Subrina Seenarain ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Nissan North America ("NNA") (collectively, the "Parties") enter into this stipulation with reference to the following facts and recitals:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") on September 18, 2017 (Dkt. 56);

WHEREAS, the Parties stipulated on September 19, 2017 to extend NNA's deadline to respond to the SAC to October 23, 2017 (Dkt. 57) and the Court So Ordered that stipulation on September 20, 2017 (Dkt. 58);

WHEREAS, NNA filed its Motion to Dismiss the SAC on October 23, 2017 (Dkt.59);

WHEREAS the Court's docket entry (Dkt.59) ordered that Plaintiffs' opposition to the Motion to Dismiss be filed on or before November 6, 2017 and NNA's reply be filed on or before November 13, 2017;

WHEREAS, due to the complexity of Defendant's motion, which raises additional novel issues not heretofore raised in related litigation or in the first Motion to Dismiss; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel requires a short extension of time within which to respond to the Motion to Dismiss;

Plaintiffs and NNA stipulate and agree as follows and request the Court enter an Order as follows:

1. Plaintiffs' brief in opposition to NNA's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint shall be filed by November 13, 2017;

2. NNA's reply brief in support of its Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint shall be filed by November 29, 2017. The requested modification will not impact the current case schedule

IT IS SO STIPULATED.