Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Meakin v. California Field Ironworkers Pension Trust, 5:16-cv-07195-EJD. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171117b37 Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY/OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 of the Northern District of California, Defendants California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust and Board of Trustees of the California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust ("Defendants") and Plaintiff, Robert Meakin ("Plaint
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY/OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 of the Northern District of California, Defendants California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust and Board of Trustees of the California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust ("Defendants") and Plaintiff, Robert Meakin ("Plaintiff"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the Deadline for Defendants to file a combined Reply/Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment from November 20, 2017 to November 22, 2017.

WHEREAS, the Standing Orders for Judge Edward J. Davila requires any opposition to a Cross-Motion to be incorporated into the Reply to the Opposition to the original like motion and be filed and served not more than 7 days after the filing of the combined Reply/Opposition.

WHEREAS, the Plaintiff's filed their Opposition to Defendants Summary Judgment Motion and a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on November 13, 2017 and November 14, 2017 (ECF Nos. 26 and 27).

WHEREAS, Defendants' counsel Michael Bedolla is out of the office on his honeymoon until November 27, 2017.

WHEREAS, Defendants' other counsel, Katherine McDonough will be out of the office attending all day meetings for clients on November 15, 16, and 20, 2017.

WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 6-2(a) of the Northern District of California states, "The parties may file a stipulation . . . requesting an order changing time that would affect the date of an event or deadline already fixed by Court order, or that would accelerate or extend time frames set in the Local Rules or in the Federal Rules . . ."

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the forgoing, the parties agree and hereby stipulate that the Defendants shall file the combined Reply/Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment no later than Wednesday, November 22, 2017.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendants Reply/Opposition is due by November 22, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer