Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Fleischman v. Berryhill, 3:17-CV-01502-RS. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171121a94 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time of 7 days to file her Motion for Summary Judgment in response to Defendant's Answer. The current date for filing the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (MSJ) is November 15, 2017. The new due da
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time of 7 days to file her Motion for Summary Judgment in response to Defendant's Answer. The current date for filing the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (MSJ) is November 15, 2017. The new due date will be November 22, 2017. Plaintiff's attorney came down with a gastrointestinal illness on Friday, November 10. Symptoms have continued through today. If the Court needs evidence of his November 12 doctor office visit, Plaintiff's attorney is happy to provide it. Plaintiff's attorney has come into the office every day and made his best effort to finish the MSJ, but has been working less productively than usual and believes he has a duty to his client to take extra time to finish the MSJ. Plaintiff's attorney also wishes to point out that Plaintiff's first extension of time was before Plaintiff's attorney substituted in as attorney, replacing the Plaintiff who had been Pro Se, and the second extension of time was for 14 days only.

Plaintiff's attorney sincerely apologizes to the Court and to the Defendant for any inconvenience caused by this delay. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

ORDER:

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer