Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

USA v. Flores, CR 17-116 HSG. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171121b26 Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONDITIONS OF RELEASE AND APPEARANCE KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . With the agreement of counsel for both parties, with United States Pretrial Services, and with the consent of defendant Mark Flores, the Court enters this order documenting an amendment to the CONDITIONS OF RELEASE AND APPEARANCE dated March 14, 2017. The parties agree, and the Court finds and holds as follows: 1. Defendant appeared before this Court on March 14, 20
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONDITIONS OF RELEASE AND APPEARANCE

With the agreement of counsel for both parties, with United States Pretrial Services, and with the consent of defendant Mark Flores, the Court enters this order documenting an amendment to the CONDITIONS OF RELEASE AND APPEARANCE dated March 14, 2017. The parties agree, and the Court finds and holds as follows:

1. Defendant appeared before this Court on March 14, 2017 for a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3142(e) and 3142(f). At that time, this Court released the defendant on a $75,000.00 unsecured bond, with among other standard conditions, specifically the following added conditions: a. Electronic detention at home other than for pre-approved legal and medical appointments; b. Surrendering of his DEA registration; c. No practicing of medicine or attempts to provide medical care to anyone except a family member in an emergency; d. Shall not possess any prescriptions or prescription pads; e. Shall have no contact with people he formerly prescribed drugs to; and f. Shall refrain from gambling or entering into any gambling establishments. 2. On or about July 17, 2017, counsel for Mr. Flores and the United States, as well as Pretrial Services Officer Nelson Barao agreed that Mr. Flores' conditions of release could be modified to allow the defendant to leave the residence for physical exercise, family activities, and outdoor activities on a limited schedule as follows: a. Mondays: 9:00 a.m. until 11:30 a.m.; b. Thursdays: 9:00 a.m. until 11:30 a.m.; c. Saturdays: 10:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m.; and d. By approval of Pretrial Services. 3. On or about October 5, 2017, counsel for Mr. Flores and the Government agreed that Mr. Flores be allowed to leave his home from 8:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. to allow additional counseling and treatment, as well additional meetings in preparation for resolution of Mr. Flores' case. United State Pretrial Services Officer Nelson Barao does not oppose this request. The Court signed the proposed Order, and Mr. Flores' conditions of release were amended.\ 4. At this time, both counsel for the Government and Mr. Flores as well as U.S. Pretrial Services, now agree that Mr. Flores be allowed to travel with his wife and two minor children to Disneyland, Anaheim, CA in the Southern District of CA for one week for the Christmas holiday. Mr. Flores will travel by car with his family and reside at Disneyland Hotel and only travel to the amusement park. Mr. Flores will travel from December 22, 2017 through December 29, 2017. 5. Both Assistant U.S. Attorney Frank Riebli and U.S. Pretrial Services Officer Nelson Barao have been advised of this request and do not object to a modification of his electronic home detention release in order to accommodate this curfew. 6. Accordingly, and with the consent of all Parties, the Court orders that the defendant's conditions of release and appearance are so AMENDED.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer