Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Elsie Elena Iniguez v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 4:17-cv-00093-KAW. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171121b27 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 17, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A SIXTY-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Elsie Elena Iniguez (Plaintiff) and Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of sixty (60) days to deliver h
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A SIXTY-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Elsie Elena Iniguez (Plaintiff) and Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of sixty (60) days to deliver her Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The current due date is December 4, 2017. The new due date will be February 2, 2018. The parties further stipulate that all other dates will be extended accordingly. Defendant requests this extension because the attorney responsible for briefing this case will need to review and learn the more than 1,600 page record, but also has responsibility for handling an arbitration this month and litigation before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission this month and next month. The attorney assigned to brief this case also has pre-scheduled leave for the upcoming holidays, as does the attorney who will be responsible for reviewing the brief. For all these reasons, Defendant requires an additional 60 days to prepare and file her Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer