Andrews v. California Department of Consumer Affairs, 17-cv-0252-DMR. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171122d15
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2017
Summary: (PROPOSED ORDER) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS 12(B)(1)(6) (L.R. 6-1(A)) AND MOVE COURT DATE. WILLIAM H. ORRICK, III , District Judge . Plaintiff Mark Andrews ("Plaintiff') and Defendants CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMERS AFFAIRS; SONOMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES; CALIFORNIA BUREAU OF AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR; LOUISE BAYLES FIGHTMASTER, KIRK GORMAN, KATHY SIMON ("Defendants") (collectively the "Parties") by an
Summary: (PROPOSED ORDER) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS 12(B)(1)(6) (L.R. 6-1(A)) AND MOVE COURT DATE. WILLIAM H. ORRICK, III , District Judge . Plaintiff Mark Andrews ("Plaintiff') and Defendants CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMERS AFFAIRS; SONOMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES; CALIFORNIA BUREAU OF AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR; LOUISE BAYLES FIGHTMASTER, KIRK GORMAN, KATHY SIMON ("Defendants") (collectively the "Parties") by and..
More
(PROPOSED ORDER) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS 12(B)(1)(6) (L.R. 6-1(A)) AND MOVE COURT DATE.
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, III, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mark Andrews ("Plaintiff') and Defendants CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMERS AFFAIRS; SONOMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES; CALIFORNIA BUREAU OF AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR; LOUISE BAYLES FIGHTMASTER, KIRK GORMAN, KATHY SIMON ("Defendants") (collectively the "Parties") by and thru each Defendants attorney; hereby stipulate to extend the time For Plaintiff to answer or otherwise respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 12(b)(1) and (6), pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), up to and including November 16, 2017. Also agreed to by the parties, It is requested to the court to move the December 6, 2017 court date to December 13, 2017
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED BY THIS COURT:
This court orders having shown good cause, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1(a), the time for Plaintiff to answer or otherwise respond to the Motion to Dismiss is extended up to and including November 16, 2017.
Also this court orders court date from December 6, 2017 to _____________.
Source: Leagle
