Filed: Nov. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. ("IPT") and Defendants NHK International Corporation, NHK Spring Co., Ltd., Ogaki Seiko Co., Ltd., and Seiko High Tec Corp. (collectively "Defendants") filed their Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement on October 16, 2017 (D.I. 66); WHEREAS IPT's Opening Claim Construction Brief is due November 22, 2017; WHEREAS, pursuan
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. ("IPT") and Defendants NHK International Corporation, NHK Spring Co., Ltd., Ogaki Seiko Co., Ltd., and Seiko High Tec Corp. (collectively "Defendants") filed their Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement on October 16, 2017 (D.I. 66); WHEREAS IPT's Opening Claim Construction Brief is due November 22, 2017; WHEREAS, pursuant..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. ("IPT") and Defendants NHK International Corporation, NHK Spring Co., Ltd., Ogaki Seiko Co., Ltd., and Seiko High Tec Corp. (collectively "Defendants") filed their Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement on October 16, 2017 (D.I. 66);
WHEREAS IPT's Opening Claim Construction Brief is due November 22, 2017;
WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(1), the parties state that they have been, and continue to be, engaged in discussions in an attempt to narrow the areas of disagreement regarding the disputed terms for construction, and have agreed to push back the claim construction briefing schedule in light of these discussions;
WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(2), the parties state that they previously extended by stipulation the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to the complaint but that no other time modifications have been made in the case; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(3), the parties state that they do not believe the requested time modification will have an effect on the remaining schedule for the case;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the Claim Construction Schedule (D.I. 58) is amended as follows:
Event Date Set Forth in Original New Date
Claim Construction
Schedule (D.I. 58)
Plaintiff's Opening Claim November 22, 2017 December 1, 2017
Construction Brief
Defendants' Responsive December 6, 2017 December 15, 2017
Claim Construction Brief
Plaintiff's Reply Claim December 13, 2017 December 22, 2017
Construction Brief
Technology Tutorial January 16, 2018 (10:00 a.m.)
Markman Hearing January 29, 2018 (2:30 p.m.)
ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
Pursuant to the Northern District of California's Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that all signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing's content and have authorized the filing.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that that the Claim Construction Schedule (D.I. 58) is amended as follows:
Event Date Set Forth in Original New Date
Claim Construction
Schedule (D.I. 58)
Plaintiff's Opening Claim November 22, 2017 November 29, 2017
Construction Brief
Defendants' Responsive December 6, 2017 December 6, 2017
Claim Construction Brief
Plaintiff's Reply Claim December 13, 2017 December 13, 2017
Construction Brief
Technology Tutorial January 16, 2018 (10:00 a.m.)
Markman Hearing January 29, 2018 (10:00 am)