Weng v. Clark, 17-cv-05955-WHO. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171128906
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . On October 24, 2017, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granted defendant's application to proceed in forma pauperis and issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this unlawful detainer case be remanded to Contra Costa County Superior Court for lack of jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 6. Objections to Judge Laporte's recommendation were due by November 7, 2017. Federal Rule of Civil Proce
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . On October 24, 2017, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granted defendant's application to proceed in forma pauperis and issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this unlawful detainer case be remanded to Contra Costa County Superior Court for lack of jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 6. Objections to Judge Laporte's recommendation were due by November 7, 2017. Federal Rule of Civil Proced..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
On October 24, 2017, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granted defendant's application to proceed in forma pauperis and issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this unlawful detainer case be remanded to Contra Costa County Superior Court for lack of jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 6.
Objections to Judge Laporte's recommendation were due by November 7, 2017. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b); Civ. Local Rule 72-3. As of today's date, no objections have been filed.1 Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the record in this case, I ADOPT Judge Laporte's Report and Recommendation in full. This case is REMANDED to Contra Costa County Superior Court for lack of jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Plaintiff Weng filed a motion to remand on November 22, 2017. Dkt. No. 12. That motion seeks remand for the same reasons given by Judge Laporte in her Report and Recommendation.
Source: Leagle
