Filed: Nov. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT VOICEAGE CORPORATION TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO APPLE INC.'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND 1. Plaintiff Apple Inc. ("Apple") and Defendant VoiceAge Corporation ("VoiceAge"), jointly stipulate, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), to extend the time for VoiceAge to answer or otherwise respond to Apple's Second Amended Compla
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT VOICEAGE CORPORATION TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO APPLE INC.'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND 1. Plaintiff Apple Inc. ("Apple") and Defendant VoiceAge Corporation ("VoiceAge"), jointly stipulate, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), to extend the time for VoiceAge to answer or otherwise respond to Apple's Second Amended Complai..
More
STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT VOICEAGE CORPORATION TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO APPLE INC.'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
1. Plaintiff Apple Inc. ("Apple") and Defendant VoiceAge Corporation ("VoiceAge"), jointly stipulate, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), to extend the time for VoiceAge to answer or otherwise respond to Apple's Second Amended Complaint by 30 days to December 7, 2017.
2. VoiceAge requests this extension of time by 30 days in which to respond the Second Amended Complaint to allow for more time to prepare its response.
3. Apple filed the Second Amended Complaint on October 11, 2017, adding VoiceAge as a defendant. (D.I. 115.)
4. There have been no other extensions of time relating to VoiceAge, whether by order or stipulation.
5. The proposed date of December 7, 2017 for VoiceAge to respond to the Second Amended Complaint occurs more than two months prior to the February 22, 2018 hearing for oral arguments regarding the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Acacia Research Corporation, Cellular Communications Equipment GMBH, Cellular Communications Equipment LLC, Saint Lawrence Communications GMBH, Saint Lawrence Communications LLC.
6. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned counsel that, subject to the Court's approval, the time for VoiceAge to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint in the above-entitled action is extended up to and including December 7, 2017. By entering this stipulation, no party is waiving any argument, right or defense.
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the content of this document is acceptable to all persons whose signatures are indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT:
Defendant VoiceAge Corporation's time to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond is extended up to and including December 7, 2017.
