In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation, 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171204899
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RICHARD G. SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff Ingram Micro Inc. ("Ingram") and Defendants Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America (collectively, "Panasonic"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to Panasonic with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorn
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RICHARD G. SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff Ingram Micro Inc. ("Ingram") and Defendants Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America (collectively, "Panasonic"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to Panasonic with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorne..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RICHARD G. SEEBORG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ingram Micro Inc. ("Ingram") and Defendants Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America (collectively, "Panasonic"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to Panasonic with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Ingram against any other defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
FILER ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Daniel A. Sasse, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
