Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 17-cv-02162-EMC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171206c02 Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR EPA'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER BRIEFING SCHEDULE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiffs Food & Water Watch, et al., and Defendants United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al., ("EPA") hereby stipulate to and request that the Court enter the attached Order extending the deadlines associated with EPA's motion for a protective order. 1. Pursuant to the Court's September 12, 2017 Order (ECF No. 27), EPA's motion for a protective order is d
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR EPA'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Plaintiffs Food & Water Watch, et al., and Defendants United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al., ("EPA") hereby stipulate to and request that the Court enter the attached Order extending the deadlines associated with EPA's motion for a protective order.

1. Pursuant to the Court's September 12, 2017 Order (ECF No. 27), EPA's motion for a protective order is due 12/7/17, Plaintiffs' response is due 12/21/17, EPA's reply is due 1/4/18, and the hearing date is 1/18/18.

2. Due to scheduling conflicts with other current litigation, the parties have met and conferred on extending the aforementioned deadlines for the motion and reply by one week and for the response by 12 days. The parties have agreed to push the deadline for EPA's motion back to 12/14/17, Plaintiffs' response to 1/2/11, EPA's reply to 1/11/18, and the hearing date to 1/25/18. The parties also agree that the dates for the further case management conference and updated joint case management conference statement also be extended by one week.

3. This extension will not significantly delay resolution of the case.

4. Accordingly, the parties jointly stipulate and request that the Court enter the attached order providing the following schedule:

EPA's Motion for a Protective Order — December 14, 2017 Plaintiffs' Response to Motion — January 2, 2017 EPA's Reply — January 11, 2018 Updated Joint Case Management Conference Statement — January 18 Hearing and Further Case Management Conference — January 25, 2018

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Before the Court is the parties' Stipulation to Extend the Deadlines for EPA's Motion for a Protective Order Briefing Schedule And [Proposed] Order. Upon due consideration, and for good cause shown, the parties' request is hereby GRANTED. It is further ordered that the following schedule will govern Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order and Plaintiffs' response thereto:

EPA's Motion for a Protective Order — December 14, 2017 Plaintiffs' Response to Motion — January 2, 2017 EPA's Reply — January 11, 2018 Updated Joint Case Management Conference Statement — January 18 Hearing and Further Case Management Conference — January 25, 2018 (1:30

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer