Hulu LLC v. Rovi Corporation, 17-cv-02942-JD. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171208b84
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2017
Summary: ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE JAMES DONATO , District Judge . The Court is advised that the parties have settled. Dkt. Nos. 57, 60. Consequently, the Court vacates all pretrial deadlines and dismisses this case without prejudice. If any party certifies to the Court within 60 days from the date of this order that the agreed consideration for the settlement of this action has not been delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be set for a case management conference. If n
Summary: ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE JAMES DONATO , District Judge . The Court is advised that the parties have settled. Dkt. Nos. 57, 60. Consequently, the Court vacates all pretrial deadlines and dismisses this case without prejudice. If any party certifies to the Court within 60 days from the date of this order that the agreed consideration for the settlement of this action has not been delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be set for a case management conference. If no..
More
ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE
JAMES DONATO, District Judge.
The Court is advised that the parties have settled. Dkt. Nos. 57, 60. Consequently, the Court vacates all pretrial deadlines and dismisses this case without prejudice. If any party certifies to the Court within 60 days from the date of this order that the agreed consideration for the settlement of this action has not been delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be set for a case management conference. If no certification is filed, the dismissal will be deemed to be with prejudice after the 60 days.
The parties are directed not to ask the Court for a "dismissal with prejudice" at any time after this order, or to ask for an order confirming dismissal under FRCP 41(a)(1). No Court order is necessary for dismissal under that rule.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
