USA v. Lam, CR 16-532 EMC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171218737
Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . The above-captioned matter is scheduled before this Court on December 20, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. The parties continue to work on a joint resolution of the case and request that the matter be continued to January 17, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. For the above reasons, the parties stipulate there is good cause — taking into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of this case — to exclude the time from December 20, 2017 to Jan
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . The above-captioned matter is scheduled before this Court on December 20, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. The parties continue to work on a joint resolution of the case and request that the matter be continued to January 17, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. For the above reasons, the parties stipulate there is good cause — taking into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of this case — to exclude the time from December 20, 2017 to Janu..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
The above-captioned matter is scheduled before this Court on December 20, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. The parties continue to work on a joint resolution of the case and request that the matter be continued to January 17, 2018 at 2:30 p.m.
For the above reasons, the parties stipulate there is good cause — taking into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of this case — to exclude the time from December 20, 2017 to January 17, 2018 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act, and that failing to exclude that time would unreasonably deny the defendant and his counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of counsel taking into account the exercise of due diligence, as well as continuity of counsel. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). The parties further agree that the ends of justice would be served by excluding the time from December 20, 2017 to January 17, 2018 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act and that the need for the exclusion outweighs the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
