Filed: Dec. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME AND ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, as stated on the record at the status conference on December 5, 2017, that the time between December 5, 2017, and December 12, 2017, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B). Excluding such time will allow defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking int
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME AND ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, as stated on the record at the status conference on December 5, 2017, that the time between December 5, 2017, and December 12, 2017, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B). Excluding such time will allow defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into..
More
STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME AND ORDER
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
STIPULATION
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, as stated on the record at the status conference on December 5, 2017, that the time between December 5, 2017, and December 12, 2017, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B). Excluding such time will allow defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
As explained on the record at the status conference on December 5, 2017, the Court finds that the exclusion of the period from December 5, 2017, to December 12, 2017, from the time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161, is warranted; that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in the prompt disposition of this criminal case; and that the failure to grant the requested exclusion of time would unreasonably deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and would result in a miscarriage of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
