Flessner v. Tesla Motors, Inc., 3:16-cv-05571-JCS. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171219865
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL JOSEPH C. SPERO , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiff THOMAS FLESSNER ("Plaintiff") and Defendant TESLA MOTORS, INC. ("Defendant") (collectively "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and request the dismissal of Defendant as follows: 1. This action shall be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; and 2. The Parties agree to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL JOSEPH C. SPERO , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiff THOMAS FLESSNER ("Plaintiff") and Defendant TESLA MOTORS, INC. ("Defendant") (collectively "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and request the dismissal of Defendant as follows: 1. This action shall be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; and 2. The Parties agree to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED. ..
More
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiff THOMAS FLESSNER ("Plaintiff") and Defendant TESLA MOTORS, INC. ("Defendant") (collectively "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and request the dismissal of Defendant as follows:
1. This action shall be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; and
2. The Parties agree to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
I, Michael A. Wahlander, attest that concurrence in the filing of this stipulation has been obtained from Chad Saunders, Counsel for Plaintiff THOMAS FLESSNER.
Executed this 14th day of December 2017, in San Francisco, California.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
