Monteville Sloan, Jr. v. General Motors LLC, 16-cv-07244-EMC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171221a88
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2017
Summary: AMENDED ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING Docket No. 70. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . The parties shall simultaneously file supplemental briefs no later than Thursday, December 28, 2017, not exceeding 10 pages, addressing the following question: assuming the Court were to find that Defendant has not waived its challenge to personal jurisdiction, how should personal jurisdiction over the non-California plaintiffs' claims be analyzed in light of Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Sup. Ct. of Ca
Summary: AMENDED ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING Docket No. 70. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . The parties shall simultaneously file supplemental briefs no later than Thursday, December 28, 2017, not exceeding 10 pages, addressing the following question: assuming the Court were to find that Defendant has not waived its challenge to personal jurisdiction, how should personal jurisdiction over the non-California plaintiffs' claims be analyzed in light of Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Sup. Ct. of Cal..
More
AMENDED ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
Docket No. 70.
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
The parties shall simultaneously file supplemental briefs no later than Thursday, December 28, 2017, not exceeding 10 pages, addressing the following question: assuming the Court were to find that Defendant has not waived its challenge to personal jurisdiction, how should personal jurisdiction over the non-California plaintiffs' claims be analyzed in light of Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Sup. Ct. of Cal., 137 S.Ct. 1773 (2017) and any other relevant authorities?
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
