Fuson v. Target Corporation, 4:17-cv-5353 MEJ. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180201h42
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2017
Summary: [Removal from Superior Court of California. Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG17859726] JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE MARIA-ELENA JAMES , District Judge . The parties to this action, acting through counsel and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of the above-entitled action, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fee
Summary: [Removal from Superior Court of California. Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG17859726] JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE MARIA-ELENA JAMES , District Judge . The parties to this action, acting through counsel and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of the above-entitled action, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees..
More
[Removal from Superior Court of California. Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG17859726]
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, District Judge.
The parties to this action, acting through counsel and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of the above-entitled action, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.
ORDER
On December 19, 2017, the parties jointly submitted a Stipulation of Dismissal to the Court. Accordingly, the instant matter is dismissed with prejudice, and the parties will bear their own respective costs, including attorney fees and other litigation expenses.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
