Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Verinata Health, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc, 12-cv-05501-SI. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180104989 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE EXPERT REPORT OF DR. CANTOR Re: Dkt. No. 518. SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . Plaintiffs Illumina, Inc. and Verinata Health, Inc. move to strike portions of defendant Ariosa Diagnostic, Inc.'s expert Dr. Charles Cantor's report based on collateral estoppel. Dkt. No. 518. In particular, plaintiffs seek to strike Dr. Cantor's opinion that U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/0172946 ("Fan"), in combination with U.S. Patent No. 6,316,229 ("Lizardi"), ren
More

ORDER RE MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE EXPERT REPORT OF DR. CANTOR

Re: Dkt. No. 518.

Plaintiffs Illumina, Inc. and Verinata Health, Inc. move to strike portions of defendant Ariosa Diagnostic, Inc.'s expert Dr. Charles Cantor's report based on collateral estoppel. Dkt. No. 518. In particular, plaintiffs seek to strike Dr. Cantor's opinion that U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/0172946 ("Fan"), in combination with U.S. Patent No. 6,316,229 ("Lizardi"), renders obvious U.S. Patent No. 7,955,794 ("the '794 patent"). Id. at 1. In response, Ariosa represents that it will not argue at trial that the combination of Fan and Lizardi renders obvious any claim of the '794 patent. Dkt. No. 553. Therefore, the Court DENIES the motion as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer