Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Aboudara v. City of Santa Rosa, 17-CV-01661-HSG. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180104a11 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY; ORDER [Civil Local Rule 6-2] HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Initial expert disclosures are due in this case on January 22, 2018, while the deadline for filing of dispositive motions is May 3, 2018. (Dkt. 41.) The parties have conferred and agree that it will be more efficient and a better use of the parties' resources to have dispositive motions heard prior to any expert witness disclosure. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate and
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY; ORDER

[Civil Local Rule 6-2]

Initial expert disclosures are due in this case on January 22, 2018, while the deadline for filing of dispositive motions is May 3, 2018. (Dkt. 41.) The parties have conferred and agree that it will be more efficient and a better use of the parties' resources to have dispositive motions heard prior to any expert witness disclosure. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate and jointly request that the Court modify the deadlines for expert discovery as follows:

Initial expert disclosures: June 25, 2018 Rebuttal expert disclosures: July 16, 2018 Close of expert discovery: August 6, 2018

The parties do not seek to modify any other deadlines in the scheduling order at this time.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1

Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

ORDER

The Court, having considered the Stipulation of tthe parties, and good cause appearing therefor, hereby modifies the scheduling order (Dkt. 41) as follows:

Initial expert disclosures: June 25, 2018 Rebuttal expert disclosures: July 16, 2018 Close of expert discovery: August 6, 2018

All other dates remain set as set forth in the Court's scheduling order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer