Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bradford v. Citibank, N.A., 5:17-cv-06014-HRL. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180105732 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 9 HOWARD R. LLOYD , Magistrate Judge . The court having been informed that this case has settled, all previously scheduled deadlines and appearances are vacated. On or before February 27, 2018, the parties shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date, then the parties shall appear in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor of the United States District Court, 280 South First Street, Sa
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 9

The court having been informed that this case has settled, all previously scheduled deadlines and appearances are vacated.

On or before February 27, 2018, the parties shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date, then the parties shall appear in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor of the United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California on March 6, 2018, 10:00 a.m. and show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Additionally, the parties shall file a statement in response to this Order to Show Cause no later than March 2, 2018 advising as to (1) the status of the activities of the parties in finalizing settlement; and (2) how much additional time, if any, is requested to finalize the settlement and file the dismissal. If a dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated and the parties need not file a statement in response to this Order.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer