Chapman v. Baechtel Creek Inn Inc, 3:17-cv-05727-RS. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180109706
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action become and hereby is dismissed with prejudice and each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The part
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action become and hereby is dismissed with prejudice and each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The parti..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2).
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action become and hereby is dismissed with prejudice and each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.
The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement agreements).
[proposed] ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2) and each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the parties' Settlement Agreement and General Release should such enforcement be necessary.
Source: Leagle
