Stevenson v. San Francisco County Jail Medical Services, 17-cv-00336-SI. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180110907
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES Re: Dkt. No. 14 SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . Defendants have filed an ex parte request for an extension of the deadline to file a dispositive motion. Upon due consideration of the request and the accompanying declaration of attorney Kelly Collins, the court GRANTS the request. (Docket No. 14.) The court now sets the following new briefing schedule for dispositive motions: Defendants must file and serve their dispositive motion no later than April 13, 2018.
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES Re: Dkt. No. 14 SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . Defendants have filed an ex parte request for an extension of the deadline to file a dispositive motion. Upon due consideration of the request and the accompanying declaration of attorney Kelly Collins, the court GRANTS the request. (Docket No. 14.) The court now sets the following new briefing schedule for dispositive motions: Defendants must file and serve their dispositive motion no later than April 13, 2018. ..
More
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
Re: Dkt. No. 14
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
Defendants have filed an ex parte request for an extension of the deadline to file a dispositive motion. Upon due consideration of the request and the accompanying declaration of attorney Kelly Collins, the court GRANTS the request. (Docket No. 14.) The court now sets the following new briefing schedule for dispositive motions: Defendants must file and serve their dispositive motion no later than April 13, 2018. Plaintiff must file and serve on defense counsel his opposition to the dispositive motion no later than May 11, 2018. Defendants must file and serve their reply brief (if any) no later than May 25, 2018.
Defendants are reminded that any motion for summary judgment must be accompanied by a Rand notice in a separate document at the time they file their motion for summary judgment. See Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 939 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 960 (9th Cir. 1998).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
