Strumlauf v. Starbucks Corporation, 4:16-cv-1306-YGR. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180112931
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2018
Summary: [ PROPOSED] JUDGMENT YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's January 5, 2018 Order granting the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Starbucks Corporation ("Defendant"), which dismissed all of the claims asserted by Plaintiffs Siera Strumlauf, Benjamin Robles and Brittany Crittenden ("Plaintiffs"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall have judgment in its favor against Plaintiffs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that
Summary: [ PROPOSED] JUDGMENT YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's January 5, 2018 Order granting the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Starbucks Corporation ("Defendant"), which dismissed all of the claims asserted by Plaintiffs Siera Strumlauf, Benjamin Robles and Brittany Crittenden ("Plaintiffs"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall have judgment in its favor against Plaintiffs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that ..
More
[ PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Court's January 5, 2018 Order granting the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Starbucks Corporation ("Defendant"), which dismissed all of the claims asserted by Plaintiffs Siera Strumlauf, Benjamin Robles and Brittany Crittenden ("Plaintiffs"),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall have judgment in its favor against Plaintiffs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing and that Defendant shall have its costs of suit.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
