Alejandro Picazo v. Randstad US, LP, 5:16-cv-06644-HRL. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180117835
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Re: Dkt. No. 78 HOWARD R. LLOYD , Magistrate Judge . Upon review of the papers, as well as the discussion held at the December 19, 2017 status conference, the court concludes that, under the circumstances presented, the imposition of sanctions would not serve the interests of justice. Defendant's motion therefore is denied. SO ORDERED.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
Re: Dkt. No. 78
HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.
Upon review of the papers, as well as the discussion held at the December 19, 2017 status conference, the court concludes that, under the circumstances presented, the imposition of sanctions would not serve the interests of justice. Defendant's motion therefore is denied.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
