Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Harris v. Target Corporation, 4:17-cv-06025-HSG. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180124a44 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ESI ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . This stipulation is entered into by and between plaintiff Shana Harris ("Plaintiff") and defendants Target Corporation and Target Stores, Inc. ("Defendants," and with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel. The Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, to an extension of time to file a proposed ESI Order and Protective Order.
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ESI ORDER

This stipulation is entered into by and between plaintiff Shana Harris ("Plaintiff") and defendants Target Corporation and Target Stores, Inc. ("Defendants," and with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel. The Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, to an extension of time to file a proposed ESI Order and Protective Order. This Stipulation is based on the following facts and the accompanying declaration of Steven M. McKany:

1. In their January 16, 2018 Joint Case Management Statement (ECF No. 24), the Parties indicated an intent to submit a proposed protective order and ESI order to the Court by January 23, 2018.

2. The Parties are negotiating the contents of the documents in good faith and anticipate requiring additional time to finalize the documents.

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED as follows:

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b) and 6-2, the Parties will submit a proposed Protective Order and ESI Order to the Court for approval by January 31, 2018.

The requested modification will not impact any upcoming dates, including the initial case management conference scheduled for January 23, 2018, or the case schedule to be set at or following the initial case management conference.

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION

I hereby attest, pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory indicated by the "conformed" signature (/s/) of Megan O'Neill within this e-filed document.

/s/ Steven M. McKany

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer