Gray v. Shulkin, 17-cv-03973-HSG. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180129767
Visitors: 27
Filed: Jan. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2018
Summary: AMENDED ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 33 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 72-1, this matter is referred to a Magistrate Judge for settlement within 90 days, subject to the assigned Magistrate Judge's availability. The parties will be advised of the date, time and place of the next appearance by notice from the assigned Magistrate Judge. Counsel shall follow any standing orders or other instructions given by the assigned
Summary: AMENDED ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 33 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 72-1, this matter is referred to a Magistrate Judge for settlement within 90 days, subject to the assigned Magistrate Judge's availability. The parties will be advised of the date, time and place of the next appearance by notice from the assigned Magistrate Judge. Counsel shall follow any standing orders or other instructions given by the assigned M..
More
AMENDED ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR SETTLEMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 33
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 72-1, this matter is referred to a Magistrate Judge for settlement within 90 days, subject to the assigned Magistrate Judge's availability. The parties will be advised of the date, time and place of the next appearance by notice from the assigned Magistrate Judge. Counsel shall follow any standing orders or other instructions given by the assigned Magistrate Judge.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
